National Association for the Advancement of . . . Oh, Just Read Below

I noticed in the news today (and a couple of times last week as well) that the NAACP was getting involved or making statements. It got me thinking . . . National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. That is a funny name. See, we are not allowed to call Black people "colored" but the organization is. Why don't they call themselves NAAAAP (N-quadruple A-P) for the National Assoc. for the Advancement of African-American People? Furthermore, are all people of color advanced through this historied organization? I mean, are Chinese, Vietnamese, Mexicans, Cubans, and Southern Europeans all represented equally in the NAACP? I looked on their website and it seemed to me that a more representative name SHOULD be NAAAAP (for obvious reasons).

That really got me thinking. There is a Black Coaches Kickoff Classic college football game each year. There is a Black Coaches Association. There is African-American month (or is it Black Month or Colored Month - and when is it anyway). Man, after looking around on Google for a few minutes I was shocked - the black community has a corner on everything. Ebony Magazine, BET, Black Family Channel, the BET Awards, and the list goes on.

DISCLAIMER (or SPOILER): For those of you who read my blog a lot are probably not surprised when I tell you that I am a white, protestant, male - just thought you should know. Now, I am not advocating magazines ONLY meant for white people, or a TV network and associated awards ONLY for white people, or a White Coaches Kickoff Classic football game. I think that would be a bit over the line a called racist. However, I am seriously going to look into creating a national organization called NAAWG (N-double A-W-G) or the National Association for the Advancement of White Guys. See this is simple - the most discriminated population in America today is . . . drum roll please . . . the WHITE PROTESTANT MALE! You laugh. Open any scholarship book at Barns and Nobles. There are scholorships for Hispanics, Blacks, Women, Cubans, Greeks, Chinese, Jews, Muslims, and the list goes on. Now look under the category in the book entitled "Scholarships for Whites" or "Scholarships for Males". Are they there? NO. So here it is . . . National Association for the Advancement of White Guys. I will use the Fighting Whities logo - but change it to blue (red looks to Native American - I'm kidding).

Now that I have your attention, think for a moment how my audacity makes you feel. Are you ticked that I would try to advance myself because of my race or sex? Sure you are. But the world - well mostly our country - gives a free pass to others based on their race or sex. Hell, this country not only gives a free pass to these people, but at times the media and government listens to these groups when they may only make up less than 1% of the total population.

Put this in perspective. Becasue Mitt Romney is running for president I will use him as an example. Lets say that Mormons (who make up less than 2% of the American population, decided to storm Washington with legislation asking for polygamy to be legal. Imagine they were allowed by the goverment to have a Polygamy Rights Day parade each year. Imagine if they created coalitions for Polygamy Rights. The country would laugh. The country would immediately tell them to sit down, shut up, and quite fighting for rights based on Mormon habit and traditions. So then, why does the country not say the same to the GLB population (they make up less than 1% of the population)? They have their months, their parades, their coalitions. It is a double standard. Now I am not advocating a pro-polygamy group - one wife is enough, but the point still stands.

So mark it on your calanders - February 1, 2008 is the first day of NAAWG. We also now brand February "White Guy" month, mostly because of all the snow that is white also.

Juan McLame, Dem from LaLaLand

The following is a brief reminder about John McCain (Republican from AZ):

- New Your Time endorsed him (most liberal-touting conservative-hating newspaper east of the Mississippi.
- Ann Coulter said she would vote Hilary over McLame (Ann Coulter!!! This is the conservative she-devil that would like to bite Hilary's head off - literally.)
- Arnold (Democrat governor of CA) endorsed him - I know, I said Democrat when he is a registered Republican, but we all know the truth (KENNEDY REPUBLICAN!)
- Congressman Martinez from FL endorsed him - this is the guy who wants open boarders from FL to CA.
- McCain-Kennedy bill: The "Essential Worker Visa Program" with a new category called "H-5A." Translation - quasi-amnesty
- McCain-Feingold bill: Campaign finance bill that explicitly restricts free speech (that would be our first ammendment)
- McCain-Edwards/Kennedy bill: Gives more opportunities (I mean RIGHTS) to patients to sue their medical care-givers.
- NOT endorsed by Rush (who said that McCain is the vehicle to fracture the Republican party), Laura Ingrahm, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Rielly, and most other true conservative Reaganites.
- Is unable to get a plurality of votes from the conservative base in any primary or caucus thus far (see exit polls).
- Has the worst luck in American military history: shot and nearly sank his own aircraft carrier, was a poor pilot who only got a plane to fly because his daddy was a big shot military guy, got shot down by the North Vietnamese (although he survived and that qualifies him for the highest office in the world??!!??).

I don't know, for the first time in my life I am beginning to agree with Ann Coulter. Hilary almost looks like a better choice than Juan McLame. Either way, I am going to have a lot to write about over the next few years. Go Donkeys!!!

Christmas Came Early For Republicans - Like It Did In 2004

Merry Christmas Republicans. You might as well hand over the presidency to the the Elephants again. Didn't you hear? The momentum leading, potential front-running Democratic party candidate, Barack Obama, was annointed the "most liberal Senator" in the country today. This is wonderful. Republicans and conservatives alike already knew that Hillary was liberal (and polarizing), and now Republican can bask in the beauty that the country now knows that Obama is as well. Didn't this happen in 2003 with John Kerry? Yup! And guess what, Bush Jr. rode it all the way to the White House. The only one who would screw up such news, however, could be Mr. McCain (didn't he come in at a close 2nd on the list). He will probably forget this bit of info on Barack by the time August and September rolls around - so maybe it won't matter at all.

The Lying Fraud

I now choose to tackle biggest fraud in modern American history - Juan McCain. This is a simple task considerting the grave that he begun to dig just prior to the FL primaries regarding Mitty's "timetables" comment. Hey no-brainer, check your sources before you begin to lie! Don't get me wrong, all politicians lie about their positions to please the party they aim to represent (its called pandering - and its rampant); but there comes a time when reading the whole story before you say something stupid and totally false is important. Mr. McCain, you have pissed me off! Also, when are you going to admit that you created liberal bills such as McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Edwards/Kennedy, and the list goes on? If you are Mr. Straight-Talk-Express, then stand up and admit to creating these liberal bills. You can be wrong on your past, but admit it you lying fraud. Obviously Mitty was wrong on right-to-life issues, and he admitted his mistake. Look where he is today - Guiliani would be so lucky. So here is my advice - stop the lying, stop with the timetables comments, stop avoiding questions regarding your past record and join the conservative party. You are a liberal in sheeps clothing and, once again, look where that got Guiliani. It is a crying shame that the only conservative talkshow host in the nation that supports you is Michael Medved - the liberal goof from an equally liberal Seattle. Rush, Laura, Savage, Hannity (admitted he will vote for Mitt in the NY primary), and many more all suppory Mitt Romeny! Why? Because he is conservative you dishonest fruit. Once again, join the conservative train or join Guiliani, Bloomberg, and all the other fence-sitting liberal-moderates.

The Slow Death of Hollywood - Get Out The Ribbons

Many times I attempt to tackle social issues on this blog as well (see Bathroom Etiquette and articles on Christmas below). I am driven lately to again discuss the degradation of our society, but this time from a celebrity standpoint. I am saddened (although not surprised) to hear about Heath Ledger's death last week. It is a shame to see a life so blessed and talented be washed away at such an early age. I am reminded of others, River Phoenix, John Belushi, Chris Farley, whose lives are finished because of the poor choices they make and their sub-culture makes. Health Ledger was a young father and actor (and I name those traits in that order even though he forgot to be the first first) who leaves a daughter, many loving family friends, and millions of fans in want for more. This because he was unwilling to deal with an addiction in a way that can assist in the resolution of poor habits. It is revealed today that Michelle Williams, mother of his child, attempted to get him into rehab for his continued drug addictions - although at the time his drug of choice was cocaine and heroin. Heath refused with a promise to stop the abuse. Well he may have stopped the cocaine and heroin, but the prescription drugs continued. We even learned that he may have died from an overdose of over-the-counter sleep medication. His death is tragis but the responsibility is his as well.

So I say to Hollywood - wear the black ribbons all you want. Make statements of regret and loss until you are blue in the face. Give accolades to a fallen companion forever. It will never be enough until as a society you embrace a culture of cleanliness, or morality, or marriage, of commitment, of loyalty. There are those out there who possess this, but I am afraid that too many of you in Hollywood embrace the opposite. Look at Brittany, Lindsay, Paris just to name a few. They sell sex, drugs, immorality.

Maybe the rest of the world, the conservative world that is, the ones who have morals, believe in something other than sex and self, should wear a ribbon on our lapels to champion the cause of resurrecting Hollywood. You all have your causes - now we have our's; Hollywood is slowly dying with greed, sex, drugs, money, and immorality. Our lapels say that we want more Musicals, more Romantic comedies without explicit sex and drug use (what happened to Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks), give us the black and whites back, the Pillow Talks, South Pacifics! Heck, give us more Moulon Rouge, Highschool Musical, and Hairspray (which was stupid). Maybe if enough of us wore ribbons for Hollywood then there would be a change in their behavior. Just maybe.

Serve Your Country Huck!!

Just a quick note for Mr. Baptist. You want to serve your country? You want to give your ALL to the citizens of the United States? If so, get the HELL out of the race and quit taking true conservative votes away from Mitt Romney! You are not going to win the nomination, so quit trying to position yourself to make a run as veep. There is more of a chance for McCain choosing Edwards as his running mate than you. Allow the American people to choose between two ideologies - McCain and his neo-liberal conservatism (does that make sense) and Mitty and his neo-conservative, liberal, conservative conservatism. Allow Americans (or at least 21 states) to choose between the conservative and the liberal in the Republican party. You will not and cannot win. And the same goes to the goof-ball Ron Paul. JUMP SHIP! If Johnny-boy and Rudy can figure this out, then surely you two are not too dense to do the same. I want to see a mono-y-mono race on both sides; that is when the fun really begins.

By the way, congrats to Mr. Dementia on his FL win. Ride the wave for as long as you can because Mitty still has cash. Tonight's debate ought to be entertaining.

The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

This is how I see the remainder of the primary season (yes, we are finally coming to an end and we are not yet to Feb. 5th): finally we have arrived to the final four - the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. They are Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. But Florida and South Carolina are not done yet, how can there only be four when there are five in the Republican race and three in the Democrat race; that equals eight?? Simple! Sweet and handsome Johnny-boy is done; he cannot and will not win S.C. and should not continue on. Ron Paul was fun while it lasted - GONE! Huckabee is out of cash and running out of Evangelicals - DONE! Guiliani made the worst political mistake EVER by not competing in IA, NH, MI, and SC; running third and almost fourth in FL and third in NY (his home state) is pathetic - SEE YOU LATER RUDY!

So that leaves the FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE. This wonderful description from the Book of Revelations is appropriate for the final four characters. Typically the four horsemen are representative of the following ideas: War, Famine, Conquest and Death. War = John McCain for the man who want to fight on at all costs. Conquest = Mitt Romney for continuing to have to overcome the attacks on Mormonism and his flip-flopping. Famine = Barack Obama for what this county will be if he a takes over (you think looming recession is badl; vote for Barack and famine is not too far behind). And Death = Hillary for . . . well do I need to say much more; death to democracy and birth to Socialism. Just imagine and Hillary/Obama ticket (which WILL happen); death coupled with famine. That sounds attractive.

So here is how it is all going to go down on the Elephant side: Mitt will win FL (+57 delegates) Mitt will get the momentum to win CA, UT and most of the midwest and conservative South. McCain will win NY, NJ, and AZ with small pick-ups in other states. That will leave Mitt in a commanding lead for the nomination. He will clean up the rest of the midwest and south over the next few weeks and have the nomination locked up by mid-March.

For the Donkeys: Barack wins SC and Hillary wins most of the rest. She will easily take NY, NJ and win CA. She will lose some small states - UT, ID, but will win enough of the others (AZ, CT, MN) to counter balance the southern Obama vote. She will have the nomination wrapped up on Feb. 5th.

Then she picks Obama as a running mate and Mitt picks a strong conservative from the south with solid foreign policy background and LET THE RACE BEGIN.

My prediction for President in November: Nice try! Give me a chance to bask in my success for picking at least these four or two or however many win.